WebThere are three requirements to establish proprietary estoppel: Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18. The landowner must have given the individual a valid assurance; ... and c) the … WebFeb 26, 2024 · Rather than the actual interest, reasonable reliance depends on the assurance, which “must be unambiguous and must appear to have been intended to be taken seriously,” and whose meaning “would reasonably have been understood as intended to be taken seriously as an assurance which could be relied upon” (para 26, quoting …
Thorner v Major (2009): Proprietary Estoppel and Inheritance - SSRN
WebIn a leading decision of the House of Lords, Thorner v Major & Ors [2009] UKHL 18 ('Thorner v Major'), Lord Walker at [29] noted a passage from a UK text book, An Introduction to … WebJan 11, 2024 · The broader approach was approved by the House of Lords in Thorner v. Major [2009] UKHL 18 where the court approved the analysis of an estoppel as being based on three main elements of representation / assurance, reliance and detriment, and held that cases of pure acquiescence were to be analysed as cases in which the landowner’s … bruce mathers md
Fn11 collymore v george 2008 72 wir 229 note s 129a - Course Hero
WebThe House of Lords has recently handed down its judgment in Thorner v Majors and others [2009] UKHL 18; The Times, 26 March 2009. The case concerns the doctrine of … WebThorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18 is an English land law case, concerning proprietary estoppel. Thorner v Major; Court: House of Lords: Full case name: Thorner (Appellant) v … Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18 is an English land law case, concerning proprietary estoppel. evusheld billing code